Stacey Schlimmer Attorney | Criminal Defense Attorney | Family Law Attorney | Overland Park
  • HOME
  • ATTORNEY STACEY SCHLIMMER
    • Free Consultation
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Criminal Blog
    • CINC / False Accusation of Child ABuse
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Crimes
    • Robbery, Theft and Burglary
    • White Collar Crimes
    • Drug Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Assault & Battery
    • Appeals
    • Domestic Violence
    • Probation Violation
    • Expungement
    • Traffic Offenses
    • Kansas Sentencing
    • Administrative Hearing - License Suspension
    • Protection from Abuse (PFA) and Protection from Stalking (PFS) Orders
  • CONTACT

Do Police Need a Warrant to Use Drug Sniffing Dogs in Drug Cases?

4/19/2013

0 Comments

 
While technological advances have provided law enforcement with new tools to conduct surveillance and searches, these advances can constitute serious violations of an individual’s privacy interests.  One area where law enforcement has become more sophisticated without developing new technology involves the use of dogs to detect illegal narcotics.  Drug sniffing dogs are so effective that they can detect the presence of illegal drugs from as far as a mile away.  Because of the extensive training and ability of dogs to detect contraband at such great distances, the courts have constructed laws that limit the use of K-9 drug detection units.

The Fourth Amendment provides that individual have a right to protection from unreasonable search and seizures.  While warrantless searches are presumed to be unreasonable, there are many exceptions to the warrant requirement that allow the police to skirt the edges of the Fourth Amendment.  Further, there are locations, such as the inside of one’s home where individuals are presumed to have the greatest protection of their privacy interests because they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Searches of a private home without a warrant are more likely to run afoul of the prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures than a traffic stop in a vehicle.  We have provided an overview of how these principles apply in the context of dogs trained to detect marijuana, cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, ecstasy and other illegal drugs.

Because of the strong interest people have in privacy within their home and the areas immediately outside of one’s home, drug sniffing dogs may not be used to detect drugs inside a person’s residence without a search warrant.  A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court held that the use of drug detecting dogs outside one’s home to alert officers of marijuana inside the home constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.  This means that the police generally need a warrant to use a drug sniffing dog to detect narcotics inside a home with a dog in the area outside the home.

The notion that a person’s home is his or her castle is emphasized by the much more extensive use of drug sniffing dogs permitted when people are stopped while driving a vehicle.  Law enforcement may use drug K-9 units outside a stopped vehicle to detect narcotics inside the car even if the police have no basis for believing there are drugs in the vehicle.  The U.S. Supreme Court has even condoned the use of drug sniffing dogs after a driver is pulled over for a traffic violation to provide probable cause for search of a vehicle.

Kansas City criminal defense attorney Stacey Schlimmer provides aggressive defense to protect her clients from becoming collateral damage in the “War on Drugs.”  She aggressively asserts her clients right to be protected for unreasonable search and seizures.  Our Kansas criminal defense law firm offers a confidential free consultation so call us today at 913-219-5424 or contact us online.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    2nd Amendment
    Aggravated Assault
    Aggravated Robbery
    Appeal
    Armed Robbery
    Arson
    Assault
    Bac Breath Test
    Breakdown In Communication
    Burglary
    Cannabinoids
    Child Abuse
    Child Custody
    Child Pornography
    Consequences
    Court Rulings
    Court Rulings
    Courts
    Criminal Defense Attorney
    Criminal Records
    Damage To Utility Company
    Date Rape
    Dealing With Charges
    Defense Against Rape Charges
    Diversion
    Divorce
    Dna Swabs
    Domestic Violence
    Double Jeopardy
    Downward Durational Departure
    Driving Under The Influence
    Drug Charges
    Drug Sniffing Dogs
    Dui
    Dui Conviction
    Dui Defense
    Evidence
    Expert Witness
    Expungements
    False Allegations
    Family Law
    Felony
    Field Sobriety Test
    Firearms
    Forgery
    Fourth Amendment
    Grand Theft
    Guns
    Hard 50
    Indecent Assault
    Indecent Exposure
    Intent To Distribute
    International Child Custody
    Internet Crimes
    Intoxicated Driver
    Jury Instruction
    Jury Trial
    Juvenile Law
    Kansas City Criminal Defense Attorney
    Kansas Consumer Protection Act
    KSA 60-1507
    Marijuana
    Media
    Medicinal Marijuana
    Methamphetamine
    Miranda Rights
    Myths
    Paraphenalia
    Petty Theft
    Pornography
    Possession Of Marijuana
    Preliminary Hearing
    Property Damage
    Prostitution
    Public Defender
    Racial Profiling
    Rape Charges
    Robbery Charges
    Search Warrant
    Self Defense
    Sentencing
    Sex Crimes
    Sex Crimes Against A Minor
    Sex Crimes Defense
    Sex Offender Registration
    Sex Offenses
    Sexting
    Sexual Activity Charges
    Sodomy
    Solicitation Of A Minor
    Spanking
    Stop And Frisk
    Support Proceedings
    Supreme Court
    Supreme Court
    Tax Stamp
    Theft
    Theft By Force
    Theft Charges
    Theft Conviction
    Traffic
    Violent Crimes
    Waiving Constitutional Rights
    Warrant
    White Collar Crime
    Withdraw

    Archives

    October 2015
    July 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012

    RSS Feed

Powered by
  • HOME
  • ATTORNEY STACEY SCHLIMMER
    • Free Consultation
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Criminal Blog
    • CINC / False Accusation of Child ABuse
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Crimes
    • Robbery, Theft and Burglary
    • White Collar Crimes
    • Drug Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Assault & Battery
    • Appeals
    • Domestic Violence
    • Probation Violation
    • Expungement
    • Traffic Offenses
    • Kansas Sentencing
    • Administrative Hearing - License Suspension
    • Protection from Abuse (PFA) and Protection from Stalking (PFS) Orders
  • CONTACT
✕